Wednesday, September 19, 2018

Trait variability by sex in the General Social Survey

Before the Greater Male Variability hypothesis falls out of the news, take a look at the standard deviations, by sex, among GSS respondents on a host of major life measures:


Traits that are more determinative of male sexual market value (SMV) than of female SMV show greater variability among men, just as the hypothesis predicts.

There are a couple of exceptions to the greater male variability rule, though, where female variability is greater. And wouldn't you know it, it's for the two traits that are distinctly more determinative of female SMV than of male SMV value.

Parenthetically, the intelligence measure via the ten-question vocabulary test has an artificial ceiling because respondents can do no better than get 10 out of 10 questions correct. If there were 100 words or a 1,000 words on the test, it's likely that the male SD would be even larger relative to the female SD than it appears here. It would probably resemble the disparity in educational attainment.

Regarding wealth, a lot of it is shared in marriage or accrues to women who outlive the men who accumulated it, so the gap as shown above likely understates the true difference in variability between men and women in affluence. There are more male billionaires but also more homeless men without a penny to their names than there are women.

Even with these quite imperfect measures, then, the results seem almost too good to be true, but the items used are honestly the ones that came to mind as having utility for evaluating what the survey had to offer regarding the question.

If you're aware of other broad measures in the GSS that should be considered, please share in the comments (they cannot be dichotomous, obviously--the responses need to exist across a spectrum).

GSS variables used: WEALTH, HEIGHT, WEIGHT, RLOOKS, GOD(1-5), EDUC, WORDSUM, BORN(1), SEX

Monday, September 17, 2018

Becoming Darren Wilson

The percentages of respondents who thought the Grand Jury should've indicted police officer Darren Wilson in the death of Michael Brown:


In multiracial societies, you don't use standards of ethical behavior or the morality of actions to assess justice, you assess justice in accordance to race and ethnicity.

Brown was a criminal thug who assaulted and stole from a clerk and then tried to steal a cop's gun and shoot him with it after being pulled over for walking down the middle of the road. Brown was very obviously guilty as sin yet only 1-in-5 blacks thought officer Wilson should not have been sacrificed.

Is South Africa making sense now? If blacks were 90% of the US population instead of less than 15% of it, Wilson wouldn't have just had his career ruined and to have gone into hiding, he and his family would've been butchered like Boers.
Mendacious media's blood libel against middle America

Welcome to the skins game. There are only two questions you'll need to ask going forward: Who? Whom?

Let them guide the formation, maintenance, and enforcement of all of your nation's policies, especially its immigration policies.

Saturday, September 15, 2018

Throwing November


And tax cuts. From Reuters-Ipsos, the issue registered Democrats and Republicans identified as the most important one in determining their mid-term congressional votes (N = 26,785): 


The contrast between the priorities of congressional Republican 'leadership' and what their voters care about is why the GOP is called the Stupid Party. That's unfair to people like Paul Ryan, though, who are doing exactly what their paymasters want them to do. The stupid slur may be more aptly applied to Republican voters. They voted for a Muslim ban and a wall and all they got were these lousy corporate tax cuts, after all.

The mid-terms are largely about motivating the base to turn out, so it could be plausibly argued that's why Republican congressional leadership is trying to throw the House to Democrats avoid the National Question. After all, Democrats are fired up about it, too. Right?

No, not really, as the graph above illustrates. VDare nails it by asserting that they want to lose.

Friday, September 14, 2018

Don't be Republican; Do the left thing

This religious service--where rigid intellectual, moral, and spiritual conformity is assumed--fronts as a corporate activity led by chief executives of the country's leading tech company, one of the largest publicly-traded firms in the world:



This particular meeting took place prior to James Damore's defenestration. How a centrist like Damore managed to avoid being raised up as a blood sacrifice at one of these gatherings is anyone's guess.

From the FEC, the distributions of 9,132 personal donations to 2016 US presidential campaigns from Google employees, by candidate and also by party:



Yes, Democrats outraised Republicans nearly 30-to-1. And yes, Jill Stein received more in campaign contributions from Google employees than any Republican. Indeed, she received more than the top three GOP recipients--Donald Trump, Marco Rubio, and John Kasich--combined!

That's where the hive running the world's search engine results is coming from.

A message from a friend with decades of experience in Silicon Valley provided a being hit on the head lesson, describing what should have become common knowledge by now:
I wish the Right understood deeply how much they are considered morally illegitimate in some very important quarters. The Right loses because they are a bunch of rubes, suckers, and fools who do not realize their own good will is not returned in kind by the other side.
In the interest of fairness, the biggest driver of traffic to this humble blog is Google. Or at least it was before this post!

Tuesday, September 11, 2018

Pillars of salt

Jig Bohnson writes:
Did you read the Pennsylvania report, or the NY Times victim oped? Surprising number of female victims and heterosexual predators. It is not accurate to call this a strictly gay scandal.
Excerpted directly from the gorillion-page report:
Most of the victims were boys; but there were girls too. Some were teens; many were prepubescent.
Over 1,000 victims were identified (although they are obviously not named in the report). If for the sake of both simplicity and the benefit of Sodom we assume 501 male victims and 500 female victims and assume 5% of the population is gay--not bisexual, but exclusively homosexual--we get homosexuals overrepresented among the perpetrators at a rate of nearly 2,000% relative to the broader adult population.

If we take a more plausible estimate of 1,000 male victims and 100 female victims, and assume 2.5% of the population is gay, we get homosexuals overrepresented among the perpetrators by a rate of 39,000% relative to the broader adult population!

Not only are a lot of these creeps homosexuals, they're also pedophiles. This isn't surprising given that male homosexuals, who are neotenous across a whole range of characteristics, are more likely to be pedophilic than heterosexual men are (the rate is disputed, but I suspect the difference is large).

Sacrificing children to Moloch, god of Diversity, is standard operating procedure for the cultMarx left, so there should be no question as to why the mendacious media does everything it can to obfuscate the gay, pedophilic angles to this ongoing disgrace.

In the Current Year, the Church could, with a little diligence and a dollop of technical savvy, keep most faggots away from the cloth. This is a problem that could mostly be reformed away, but only by focusing on the gay.

That won't happen, though. Better a nearly 2,000-year old pillar of Western civilization collapse into the dust than rude, after all!

Sure, taking down a sacred institution like the Catholic Church is generally desirable, but not at the expense of taking down something truly sacred--homosexuals. The media acts accordingly.

Here, for example, is the accompanying photo to the top search engine-returned article on the report, from the Washington Post. Meshes rather well with #MeToo, you see:


The major media commits plenty sins of commission, but it's the perpetual sins of omission that really distort the perception of reality that credulous consumers of news end up with.

Tangentially, since validating stereotypes is the blog's raison d'etre, let's validate another one. Relative to males, female sexuality is fluid. Bisexuality is predominately a woman's thing. Indeed, of the 222 self-identified bisexuals included in the GSS, 70% (156) have been women to just 30% (66) that have been men.

Additionally, most bisexual women have children while most bisexual men do not. It's thus a stretch to consider most "bisexual" women gay.

GSS variables used: SEXORNT(2), SEX, CHILDS

Sunday, September 09, 2018

Don't allow buggers unsupervised access to boys

Pat Buchanan on the crisis of the Catholic church:
For too long, the Catholic faithful have been forced to pay damages and reparations for crimes and sins of predator priests and the hierarchy’s collusion and complicity in covering them up.

And it needs be stated clearly: This is a homosexual scandal.
The percentage of men, by sexual orientation, who do not deem it always morally wrong for 14 year-olds to have sex. Responses are from 2008 through 2016 (N = 2,649):


The question implies those being inquired about are roughly the same age, but if it is acceptable for an 18 year-old and a 38 year-old, why not a 14 year-old and a 34 year-old?

Allowing gay men private access to teenage boys is a really bad idea, an idea considerably worse even than giving heterosexual men private access to teenage girls. Buggers are often emotionally neotenous. Self-restraint, especially when it comes to sensual debauchery, is not a virtue male homosexuals tend to possess.

Giving sodomites bishoprics is akin to selecting the most dissolute heterosexual middle-aged men around and putting them in close, private contact with teenage girls whom they have power and authority over and hoping nothing bad will come of it.

GSS variables used: TEENSEX(1), SEX(1), SEXORNT

Saturday, September 08, 2018

Did Charlottesville kill the alt right?

No. The ideas and sentiments driving it live on, perhaps--as Swedes go to the polls to possibly make the Sweden Democrats the country's largest party--stronger than ever before. But the term itself may have been a casualty. The following graph shows internet search engine interest for "alt right" since January of 2016:


Parenthetically, I realize the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, VA in 2016 was the second such event, not the first, but it is the only such event associated with the phrase "Unite the Right" generally recognizable among the public today, and that will be even more strongly the case in the future.

Campaign contributions per vote received, 2016 US presidential election

The last time the Republican candidate for president raised more money than the Democrat did was in 2004, when George Bush brought in 10% more than John Kerry. 

In 2016, Hillary Clinton raised nearly twice as much as Donald Trump. The following table shows how much the top five vote-getting candidates in 2016 'paid' for each vote they received:


Whether it should be called an oligarchy, a kleptocracy, a kakocracy, a corporatocracy, or something else, the thing that rules us is of the left. 

Friday, September 07, 2018

Democrats running on immigration restriction of any kind?

Are there any in the country who are doing so in gubernatorial, House, or Senate elections in November? In Kansas, Kris Kobach's opponent Laura Kelly offers not a word about immigration in the "issues" section of her campaign website. And Sharice Davis, who is running against the useless Kevin Yoder, has this to say:
Do the hard work necessary to finally achieve comprehensive immigration reform. 
Work across the aisle to develop common sense policy that supports our nation’s role as a beacon of hope for people around the world.
Fight to protect DACA recipients and create a pathway to citizenship for those undocumented immigrants -- our friends, teachers, neighbors -- who have known no other home.
In 2015, Bernie Sanders famously called open borders a "Koch brothers' policy". Had he not immediately course-corrected, never to volunteer another word in opposition to unfettered immigration, he would not have been able to challenge Hillary for the nomination and to have become the spiritual leader of the party that he is today. As strongly in favor of open borders as Democrat politicians are, their grassroots activists are even more zealously demanding of them.

What I'm looking for is anything even a baby-step beyond "comprehensive immigration reform".

I'm currently working on a project with a well known cultural dissident--much better known than I am--and would like to assert that there is not a single Democrat across the country running on enforcement of our existing immigration laws, let alone calls for tougher ones.

For that assertion to be made, though, it needs to be valid. If you're aware of any information to the contrary, please share in the comments.

Thursday, September 06, 2018

Trading Texas for New Germania

As Ted Cruz fights for his political life in Texas--and the day the state flips reliably blue at the presidential level draws nearer--it's worth noting that even had he lost Texas, Trump would've had a plurality of the electoral college:


The Lone Star state is the only change

I'm fond of saying he would've won even without Texas. In actuality, that's not a foregone conclusion. The rogue electoral votes in blue states probably would've went with Clinton if it meant anything more than virtue-signaling. And if not, throwing the election to the House--even under Republican control--would not have guaranteed a Trump presidency. The compromise candidate was ready!

On the other hand, if Evan McMullin hadn't played spoiler in Minnesota, Trump could've won there and thus indisputably won the presidency.

That's the lesson to draw here. If the GOP is able to pick up the upper Midwest, excepting Illinois, it can afford to lose Texas, which it is going to do short of Operation Wetback 2.0 beginning yesterday. If that doesn't happen, there won't be another Republican president, ever.

The realignment will make the implicit native-born whiteness of the Republican party more explicit and the explicit foreign-born non-whiteness of the Democrat party even more obvious than it already is.

There should be a Trumpian 2018 mid-term map highlighting the congressional districts and senate seats where Trump Republicans--with non-Trumpian Republicans conspicuously excluded--are on the ballot in November. Trump should be utilizing his direct access to tens of millions of voters to push said map on a regular basis from now through November.

Nothing like that is happening, though, because Trump is a transitional figure rather than a truly transformational one. He has widened the political Overton Window and he has provided a template for electoral success, but it's clear he is not going to be much involved in actually putting the political infrastructure in place to ensure Trumpism outlives Trump.

There are people doing so of their own initiative, however. Kris Kobach, Brian Kemp, and Rick DeSantis were outspent and out-endorsed by the party establishments of their states. Without money but with the Trumpian message, they won their primaries and are modestly favored to win their respective governors' races.

The old guard isn't going to voluntarily adopt to the new reality nor willingly step aside to allow it to occur. Their chamber of commerce money, their desire for perpetual war, and their favorable major media treatment is simply going to have to be overwhelmed and overcome at the electoral level.

Tuesday, September 04, 2018

Nike's campaign to increase Air Jordan thefts by vibrants







Via (all above)

Via

Via

Via

Via

Via

Via

Via

Via

Via
Vox Day would say Colin Kaepernick is as American as Nike's sweatshop slaves are. Normally I'd be inclined to at least qualify that assertion, but today I'm perfectly happy to let it go. Buy New Balance.

One final twist of the shiv modest proposal with regards to the deified John McCain before I vow to never speak of him again--when the wall finally gets built, Trump should name it in McCain's honor. It's how the late quisling would've wanted it:



Such sincerity. "Hey ma, get off the dang roof!" That's how he saw all of us, as slack-jawed yokels. Enjoy Dante's inner circles, pal.

Sunday, September 02, 2018

Senator, you're no Vespasian

As we enter day six of the three-week long funeral, remembrance, visitation, and worship of the deified John McCain, I find my spirits lifted by revisiting Trump's plausibly deniable shiv from a little over a year ago:


As I wrote at the time:
My first reaction was that it was one hell of a troll--the prognosis for McCain's aggressive brain cancer is poor. It's highly improbable he will "get well soon". He'll likely die soon, within the next couple of years.
That the cancer was progressive and that McCain's prognosis was terminal was well known. Trump was surely aware that McCain would not "get well soon"--unless that referred to permanently getting rid of all the pains and stresses life entails!

Seeing every member of the Inner Uniparty gathered in the Cathedral--Trump himself conspicuously and explicitly uninvited--was clarifying. Ted Kennedy's death didn't even generate one-tenth this amount of Establishment masturbating. It's gratuitous and gross.

It has renewed the vigor of my support for the president. And it made me think of that scene from Mars Attacks!. Yeah, you know the one I'm referring to:



In a figurative sense, regarding their political careers, of course. Nothing more. Nothing!

McCain pushed more amnesties, started more wars, and bankrupted more future generations than anyone else in US history. Through the course of his dreadfully long congressional career, he never missed an opportunity to stab his party, his people, and his country in the back, whether it was throwing the 2008 election to Obama or saving Obamacare after promising for years to repeal it.

It's hardly surprising then that even in this putatively hyper-partisan age, his approval rating was higher among Democrats than it was among Republicans:


Think it's uncouth to express relief at another man's passing? Fine, I'll admit there is one thing he did in my lifetime that I approve of. It happened the Saturday before last. Good riddance.

Saturday, September 01, 2018

Rules for life on caring, corpulence

Fat people do not deserve your care. They may receive it, but they don't deserve to.

If I told you I'd give you $1 million tomorrow morning if today you worked out as you were instructed to work out and ate as you were instructed to eat, would you do it? Of course you would. So you have the will power to make the necessary changes with the right motivation.

Being significantly overweight is unhealthy and unattractive.

To allow oneself to become and then remain fat evinces a lack of self-care.

It is folly to care about a person more than he cares about himself.

Your ability to care is limited. Just because someone lives in a mud hut somewhere in Cameroon does not mean some amount of your finite ability to care should be siphoned off for him. It is an affront to those more deserving of your care.

Ikso fatso, fat people do not deserve your care.

Parenthetically, that is unless they are your minor children. In that case it is your duty to care excessively for and about them. They didn't choose to be your children but you chose to be their parent. It is acceptable to be an emotional martyr for your minor children, but not for anyone else.

And if you are fat, prove to yourself--and the world--that you are worthy of being cared about by caring about yourself and shedding the sludge!

Wednesday, August 29, 2018

Whatcha wanna kill?

Chaimstream Media: That maverick McCain was a real hero.

Thinking American: How do you mean, mendacity personified?

Chaimstream Media: Well, uh, he crashed a plane and got captured by the Viet Cong.

Thinking American: How does that make him a hero?

Chaimstream Media: [Angrily] He pushed more amnesties, started more wars, and bankrupted more future generations than you ever did!

(Source)

Even the bird-brained ¡Ocasio!-Cortez is genuflecting in nauseating reverence. Agnostic wept.

This is ripe for someone with the special aesthetic touch to meme into virality:


Joe Suber provides a couple of relevant sound clips. This one gets right to the heart of orcs orcking. And this one is especially apt given the Suidlanders' deeply religious inspiration.

Theresa May should be wearing an orange sash here. My day will be made if anyone gets the reference. Hint: The last contact I had with the Warcraft universe was Warcraft II, the game that came out in 1995, so the answer doesn't post-date it.

Tuesday, August 28, 2018

Electoral behavior of white Hispanics and non-white Hispanics

Why it ended up in the queue has been lost in the sauce, but I'd made a note to look at how Hispanics have voted in US presidential elections by whether they racially identified as white or as some variety of non-white. Here it is. Predictably, white Hispanics are more Republican than non-white Hispanics are:


Hispanics in the US are increasingly identifying as non-white, and those who haven't taken the flight from white are still moving away from the implicitly white GOP.

If these "natural conservatives" were actually naturally politically conservative in a Western context, they'd have rallied to Hell's newest eternal POW, who represented the open-borders variant of said natural conservatism. Instead, McCain did worse among Hispanics than any other Republican has this millennium.

GSS variables used: HISPANIC(2-50), PRES00(1-2), PRES04(1-2), PRES08(1-2), PRES12(1-2), RACECEN1(1)(2-16)

Monday, August 27, 2018

Inverse relationship between number of partners and number of children

The average (mean) number of biological children women have by the total number of men they have had sex with since turning eighteen. To avoid racial confounding, results are restricted to non-Hispanic white women. For contemporary relevance, all responses are from the year 2000 onward. To allow family formation to have occurred, responses are restricted to women who were at least 40 years old at the time of survey participation (N = 3,845):


Kids or cocks: Choose one.

The globohomo anti-white elite and their institutions want to slut you up to lock you out--out of the future, that is. 

Choose wisely--civilization depends on it.

GSS variables used: NUMMEN(1)(2-5)(6-10)(11-20)(20-500), SEX(2), RACECEN1(1), HISPANIC(1), YEAR(2000-2016), CHILDS

Saturday, August 25, 2018

Because We Live Here

Via Heartiste, I'm reproducing in its entirety a post on an MPC forum. "Read the whole thing there" is something I type exceptionally sparingly, but this resonates so well with my 'lived experience' and that of those in my very middle class, middle American social circle that I feel compelled to share it in full here.

The next time gadfly Corvinus bleats "but how does this effect you or your family?", we'll link here and do exactly nothing else:
This is how they take over. Political types always yell about how "Latinos don't vote," but given their numbers it hardly matters.

First, you notice that a majority of little children at the elementary school level are Latino. Then bilingual signs appear in the grocery stores. Then shitty little stores selling burner phones and money wiring services. Then a few fatal DUIs, often killing elderly White people or, as in the case of the guy who made A Christmas Story, a family. Then the local Police Department has a "Gang Enforcement Unit" and their budgets are now through the roof. Then the civil rights cases start, so your local cops start pulling over you going to work at 68 in a 55 zone, while studiously ignoring the beaner beaters completely out of code and not street legal.

Then there are zero White kids at the primary level. "Social Services" becomes code for "Free stuff for Latinos." To the extent people are still walking around in your town, they are 4'11" latinas, each pushing three kids in strollers and each so pregnant they are wider than they are tall. Then the state comes in with the "women and infant children" program, congratulations, sucker, you're paying for those kids.

Then the annual New Year's Day story about "the first baby born here in X!" mysteriously always feature a blank-eyed latino couple, and the white anchors coo over Baby Rodriguez or Gonzalez. You begin to notice that you haven't seen a White baby be the first born in the New Year for ages.

A few more years pass, and every service job imaginable is filled by brown people. The town you grew up in, with young White kids hustling to mow lawns, and local high school teenagers working at McDonald's and Dairy Queen is dead as a doornail. In fact, speaking of fast food, you used to like to grab it on the go every once in a while but now ordering is an ordeal and the food always sucks..who puts that much mayonnaise on everything? (Answer: Latinos)

The new Gang Enforcement Unit isn't doing too hot, so they need more manpower, bigger budgets, maybe hire a few consultants from the L.A. County Sheriff's Department to help out. PTA and other school meetings are now held in Spanish, because 85% of the students' parents speak Spanish in the home.

A few old family restaurants have been bought out. One--it was Jack's Family Restaurant, you remember it fondly from when you were a kid--is now purple of all things and it's called "El Pulpo - Mariscos" whatever the hell that is.

A few old bars are now hangouts, and one is Salvadorean and the other Nicaraguan and there are fights. People get stabbed. Fire Chief says he needs more paramedics, budget needs to go up, so property taxes go up again.

Local hospital is in crisis due to ER room write-offs in the tens of millions. They shut down. Now, if something happens, you need to go to the City, about 40 mins away, maybe 25 if the ambulance is going Code 3, but what if something happens? That was part of the community here. Now, it's all strip mall "Urgent Care" places run by arab-ey looking "doctors" and rumor is that there is a lot of Medicare/Medicaid fraud going on.

Your high school, the one you lettered in and still go to all the football games, now has a metal detector at the entrance and two cops posted there full time. There are fights between the latinos and the 20% of students left who are White. The school counselors are now all bilingual and latino and they have posters up on their wall from strange organizations like MeCHA, that speak openly of "Brown Pride."

You're paying through the nose in taxes. No public benefits are going your way. Now, your youngest is getting to high school age and you're thinking private school, but, Jesus, how will you afford that?

Well, it's Sunday, so you're not going to think about it right now. You're going to watch some football with the guys while your wife takes the kids to the Aquatic Center for some swimming and cute pictures. Just not going to think about it right now.

And then you hear your wife pull up and the car door slam. She walks in all business, herding your three children in to go upstairs and change out of swimming clothes. You notice: no one is wet, or has been wet.

"What happened? Is everything all right?"

"No, it's not all f**king right. You won't believe what happened. I'm standing there juggling towels and floaties and the Parks and Rec guys are telling me it's now $10 a kid for a day swim pass, so I roll my eyes and I'm digging in my purse to get my card out, and then all these little mexican kids go flying through the front door and I'm like 'Hey, why aren't you telling them they have to pay' and the guy is like 'They have red wristbands" and I say "So?" and he says "it's a program we have here at the Aquatic Center for disadvantaged youths so they get the benefit of swimming and lessons in a safe environment" and they just kept piling in and I'm thinking we're already paying through the nose in taxes, and now I have to cough up money for OUR KIDS WHO WERE BORN AND RAISED IN THIS TOWN so these people can swarm the pool for free."

You're hoping she's done there, but she's not. You can feel Sunday slipping away. The "boys" can hear everything going on, but you can bet your ass they're staying out of this one. She continues:

"And there were so many of them, and they were SCREAMING AND YELLING and it was chaos, and I just, I just, couldn't do it, so I told the kids we were leaving and I turned around and walked out of there. Then, before we get to the car, James starts crying, says it's 'no fair' and that I promised we'd go swimming today all week, which is true"

And she's looking at you, because, you know the deal, you are responsible for fixing this. You think. Or maybe she's just venting. But you do what you can.

That night, you get the Sunday Night Blues and Monday morning comes around, and you're driving into work and you're looking around your town and you're thinking:

This isn't my town any more. I don't know what to do. I don't know what to do.

Am I racist? Jesus, am I becoming one of those guys. I sure sound like one of those guys.

And you're stopped at a red light a few blocks from the office and here they come, slow walking across the crosswalk, two toddlers in tow, one in a stroller, and both pregnant, and both talking as loud as they can into two cell phones.

And you laugh, because hey, it's all okay, because these people right here, right in front of me, them? They don't vote much.
When my wife and I were house-hunting for the home we planned on raising our kids and retiring in, we found one that was exactly what we wanted, almost down to the last detail. And as icing on the cake, it fed into the same elementary school I went to when I was a kid.

For every house we looked at, one of my automatic checks was of Great Schools, which, among other things, tracks the demographics of every public school in the country. Though I don't have data from the time, when I was a kid the student body had to have been north of 95% non-Hispanic white. There were three blacks kids, one dot Indian, and a Chinese boy.

Over the last couple of decades I've witnessed the same developments in leafy middle class suburbs and the retail and business parks that grow up around them that heritage Americans all across the country have. I'm more attuned to them than the average normie is, but even I was genuinely stunned when I found my former elementary school to now be less than two-thirds white. We consequently passed on the house.

Paul Kersey is right about our optimal motto: Because We Live Here.

Friday, August 24, 2018

The one-fifths compromise

The civic nationalists want to believe it. A part of me would like to believe it, too. I've mostly shed that part of myself over the last couple of years as it has become obvious that Trump's Authentic American (whites and blacks) vs Fake American (invaders) paradigm isn't going to materialize, but I'm a pragmatist. If we can believe it, let's use it.

Believe what? This:
Trump at 36 percent approval among African-Americans, new poll finds
Rasmussen's approval tracking has consistently been better for Trump than others have been, but the differences are often exaggerated. We're generally looking at about 5 points better from Rasmussen than the rest of the field. Reuters-Ipsos is my go-to even though it has a moderate left bias because it's free, user-friendly and allows all kinds of fun filters for cross-tabbing purposes.

For the 2016 presidential election, the last poll Rasmussen put out had Clinton +2 in the popular vote while the last R-I poll had Clinton +3. The official results were Clinton +2.1, so these two outfits were the cream of the crop.

R-I currently has Trump's approval among black voters at a far more plausible 14.6%. The monthly high point came back in May, when it hit 16.1% on the strength of Kanye West and, by extension, Candace Owen.

One thing that immediately becomes apparent from looking at the month-by-month figures is that the gains in approval have come entirely from picking off "mixed feelings" respondents. The "disapprove" figure for blacks hasn't budged. It's never dipped below 80%. Four out of five blacks are knee-jerk Never Trumpers. It's the Sailer Strategy or bust for the GOP.

Trump's double-digit approval among blacks isn't translating into better prospects for GOP pols in November, either. Just 7.8% of registered blacks saying they intend on voting Republican in their districts' congressional elections.

The following graph shows R-I's results on the expressed electoral intentions of registered voters six weeks from now in two-way races with "don't know" and "will not vote" responses excluded (N = 40,925--another reason R-I is great!):


Every time I look the marriage gap among women gets wider than before.

Without scaling for the size of each demographic group, it initially appears as though an impending blue wave is cresting. R-I estimates, however, that whites will account for about 73% of all congressional votes cast in November. Asians and Hispanics don't vote at rates anything like that of whites and blacks, especially in non-presidential years.

If the GOP could manage to get whites at a 2-to-1 margin, they'd scarcely need a single non-white vote to win, enact an immigration moratorium, repatriate all non-citizens living in the US, get back to making babies of their own, and Make America Great Again.

That said, back in the early Spring I estimated that Democrats would come out of the November mid-terms with a 15-seat advantage in the House while Republicans would retain the Senate. Despite taking flak from people smarter than myself for the prediction, here we are several months on and I don't think that prognostication is in need of any calibration.

Parenthetically, regular prolific commenter Feryl is now running a blog. It is up to this point primarily GSS outputs with limited accompanying commentary. We cannot have too many people look at the primary source data, so consider paying it a visit.

Wednesday, August 22, 2018

Flogging the Mollie microcosm

An anti-white white* girl from the heartland goes on a night run wearing almost nothing at all because my body, my choice.

A squatemalan invader goes feral--or a feral squatemalan invader, take your pick--hones in. Strong, independent woman that she is, needing neither man nor bicycle, she's soon decomposing in a cornfield.

The homicidal alien works for a chamber of commerce-approved Republican cuck. Savagely lusting after and killing young white women is a job Americans just won't do!

The heritage Americans she despised spend weeks looking in all the wrong places for her. By the time they figure out who the culprit is--the invader--her fate has long since been sealed.

Based Current Year, it seems.

Arise, white man. Arise! It doesn't have to be this way, but it's going to be this way if we allow it to be.

Commenter 216:
We shouldn't be using her death for political gain, the left will just claim the invader was justified in killing her to avoid deportation. Instead we should be condemning her as the traitor that she was.
Emphatically disagree. Tibbett's stupid moral posturing is empty-headed, but it's silly for us to think that the environment she was immersed in throughout the course of her short life is going to churn out anything other than a lot of young coeds who think exactly like she did. She was only 20 years-old.

To tie it to the previous post, though, in a society not locked in a death spiral, she would not at her age and in her station be permitted a say in how society functioned. No voting for unmarried college girls living off their parents.

Trump used Steinle's death to great affect and to great effect. And her death was allegedly accidental. This wasn't negligent manslaughter, it was premeditated murder.

If the GOP wasn't content to re-certify the accuracy of "the Stupid Party" moniker for the millionth time, they'd make the 2018 mid-terms a referendum on Mollie's murder. Do we welcome killers like Rivera or do we repel them?

The cucks will follow 216's advice, albeit not on account of his line of sober reasoning but on account of a despicable mix of greed and cowardice.

Most of them, anyway. But not all:


* There are assertions that Tibbetts is--or was, at any rate--partly Korean by ancestry [edit: see here]. Neither of her parents appear to be Asian. If she was adopted, it'd add yet another layer to the metaphorical microcosm of Tibbetts as a representation of the feeble, effeminate West being knocked on its back by swarthy invaders who have their way with her before chucking the carcass into the dirt to rot.

Tuesday, August 21, 2018

Wastes, exhausts, and murders itself

Discovered on the campus of this flyover state's flagship public university

Because there are exactly three genders:

1) Female
2) Male
3) Mentally handicapped

Jokes aside, Z-Man devotes an hour to explaining how democracy, if it does not die first, necessarily leads to this.

It doesn't stop here. Like a shark, it cannot stop. Once it does, it dies.

Until then, it indefatigably moves to be inclusive of everything, everywhere, in every context. Eventually the contradictions, dissonance, and mutual exclusivities become so tangled and numerous that it has nowhere left to go that doesn't mean smashing into what it has already been erected, so the whole edifice eventually comes crumbling down in a fiery crash.

Democracy is like the paint game from the SNES classic Legend of the Mystical Ninja. It starts out with plenty of room for growth. Initially the perpetual social expansiveness seems manageable but before long there is nowhere left to go. Rather than decelerating at this point, democracy continues to accelerate and then, boom!

A heavy hand then moves in to pick up the pieces. When Razib Khan says we haven't had our Sulla... yet, this is what he is talking about.

Represented graphically:


Parenthetically, the phrase now demanded by the empire of Nothing is "mentally disabled" rather than "mentally handicapped". To stay ahead of the curve, though, the most eagerly compliant members of the voluntary thought police might consider adopting "mentally challenged" or roll the dice on the blatantly Orwellian "differently abled":

Friday, August 17, 2018

Bestowing the POC shield

Heartiste:
On a primal level, one has to wonder if shitlib White women are lashing out at their own weak men through the barbed tips of anti-White agitprop.
Relatedly, the move towards miscegenation--more than 1-in-10 babies in born in the US today are mixed race--could be perceived, subconsciously or otherwise, as a way of protecting offspring. A white woman seeded by a POC will have a child contemporary American culture views as a POC. The one-drop rule gives a white parent a way to free her child of the cursed whiteness that would otherwise hang like a millstone around his neck throughout the course of his life.

In the Current Year, being white is obviously not a privilege, it's a curse. It's why every sphere of contemporary life is characterized by a flight from white. Rachel Dolezal and Shaun King don't have counterparts running from non-white to the putative privilege whiteness carries with it.

What to do? First, establish that it's okay to be white. Then make America white again by instituting a generations-long immigration moratorium, deporting all non-citizen residents, and restoring native fertility rates to (at least) replacement level.

Simple. Not easy, but simple. If we can't manage it, how surprised can we be by the behavior of shitlib white women?

No one is coming to do this on our behalf. We have to do it ourselves.

In 2008, years before we ever met, my wife voted for Obama. In 2012, when we'd been dating for a couple of months, she voted for Gary Johnson. In 2016, as a mother of two (soon to be three), she voted for Trump and of course a couple weeks ago she voted for Kobach.

That's the template. Simple.

Thursday, August 16, 2018

Governor Kobach

Commentary coming from the outside is really bad. Punditry on the modern left has largely devolved into little more than histrionic virtue signalling and moral posturing. Though the relevant data is seconds away, 0.4 minutes for verification is too much to ask as the same nonsense shows up over and over in the mouths of major media and in the feeds of the blue checkmarks.

- Kobach is an extremist who only appeals to a subset of the right. Kansas has a lot of moderates. He can't win the entire state!

In 2010, Kobach won the statewide election for secretary of state, beating Democrat Chris Biggs 59%-37%. That was the same election in which Sam Brownback dominated Democrat Tom Holland, 63%-32%.

Four years later he won it again, this time beating Jean Kurtis Schodorf 59%-41%. His reelection was especially impressive as it happened alongside governor Brownback's narrow 50%-46% reelection victory against Democrat Paul Davis.

During this time Kobach was writing laws for states and municipalities designed to give them tools to deal with the illegal invasion the federal government refused to do anything about. Though the mendacious media dropped this "breaking story" days before the 2018 gubernatorial primary, Kansans have known about Kobach's activities for the better part of a decade. That's why it didn't move the needle then and it won't move it in November.

- Kobach is Brownback on steroids!

Jeff Colyer was Brownback's running mate in 2010 and again in 2014. He was twice elected lieutenant governor, sworn in alongside Brownback both times.

The Democrat Governors Association, the outfit feeding this mantra to clueless commentators, had the cue cards ready to go for Colyer. As Brownback's right-hand man he was going to continue to former governor's disastrous policies. When Kobach primaried sitting governor Colyer, the DGA simply replaced all instances of "Colyer" with "Kobach" in the scripts and carried on as if nothing else had changed.

When someone makes this accusation--that Kobach is Brownback's successor--point out that Kobach literally defeated Brownback's successor in the primary. Chances are you'll get a deer-in-the-headlights reaction. Lots of people outside the state simply have no idea.

Colyer is Brownback's solemn simulacrum. Brownback and Kobach couldn't be further apart on the National Question, however. Brownback was a reliable, consistent voice for "comprehensive immigration reform" as senator in the 2000s and did nothing to discourage illegal aliens from squatting in the state he was governor of from 2010 through 2018.

- Kobach brought in new electronic voting machines for this election! We need paper ballots! A hard copy is insurance against digital shenanigans!

The new voting machines used in the August primary printed out a paper copy of each electronic ballot that was cast. Voters were able to review the paper ballot themselves before handing it over to an election official.

- More than twice as many people voted in the Kansas 2018 Democrat gubernatorial primary as voted in the 2010 or 2014 primaries! Impending blue wave!

While technically true, the Democrat candidates in both 2010 and 2014 ran unopposed for their respective nominations. This time around there were five people on the Democrat ballot for governor.

In 2018 there were 153,865 votes cast on the Democrat side compared to 316,887 on the Republican side. Republican turnout was more than twice as high as Democrat turnout was.

I'd be remiss not to note that this white pill contains some impurities. There are a fair number of people in the state--nobody knows the figure for certain, but I've now verified three people in my own real life social network who fit the bill--who are genuine RINOs. They are registered Republicans only for the sake of participation in Republican primaries. In general elections, they reliably vote D down the line. Because Kansas is such a heavily Republican at the state level, this allows them to always have some actual electoral influence at the voting booth.

But even if we assume that 1-in-3 non-Kobach votes were cast by RINOs intending on voting D in November, Kobach still wins 57%-43% among combined primary votes.

Herb and Chad bury the hatchet
And Colyer is throwing his support (at least publicly) to Kris. He could have pulled the pin on the recount grenade to try and blow up Kobach's chances in November. Instead, he honorably conceded. Two days after that--tonight--Kobach and Colyer held a joint rally to thank their supporters and to showcase a united front. The internecine fighting that happened during the primary will be a distant memory in twelve weeks.

Parenthetically, to understand the mindset of the modal Kansas Republican voter, listen to Colyer's concession speech. Bear this in mind when watching the general election campaign from afar. Kobach is rock solid where it counts, but he does have an election to win and he is going to have to calibrate his message accordingly to do that.

There is also Greg Orman, a rich cosmopolitan businessman running as an independent. He is essentially a chamber of commerce-approved leftist. He is an open borders zealot who is likely to steal more votes from Democrat Laura Kelly than from Kobach. In 2014, Orman challenged Republican senator Pat Roberts in the general election after Democrat Chad Taylor withdrew to make it possible for Roberts to be unseated. Roberts was reelected, but Orman got 43% of the vote. As a consequence he is now a known entity with a lot of name recognition.

It is no surprise that Kobach is consistently naming both Kelly and Orman as his opponents in November, while Kelly is risibly pretending Orman doesn't exist.

Transitioning away from standard attacks against Kris Kobach for Kansas (they're so clever, aren't they? Hey, hey, hey), here's another reason this election is so important. Kobach, a white goy from the midwest, went to Harvard for his BA, Oxford for his PhD, and Yale for his JD. He emerged from those three anti-white immersion centers as an unapologetic America First father of five with middle American sensibilities.

He's as sharp as a tack and intellectually unshakable. Unlike a pugilistic Trump or a holy-rolling Ted Cruz, Kobach's the type a moderate white professional is not embarrassed to vote for. He's a guy they can imagine as a trusted lawyer or accountant. The Democrats are trying through sheer force of will to paint him as an incompetent boob, but five minutes of hearing him speak dispels that notion:



Notice how sharp he is on the language. They're "illegal aliens", not undocumented whatevers. It doesn't matter if they "work hard", they have no claim to squat on American soil.

The rapidity with which Kobach and Colyer have buried the hatchet could be seen as an indication that Kobach is going to cuck.

In my estimation, though, it is far more likely that this is an early indication of what the Republican party's realignment is going to look like: America First hard-edged civic nationalism assuming the senior position in the party's internal coalition, while the chamber of commerce libertarianism that has characterized the GOP since Reagan gets demoted to junior partner.

Monday, August 13, 2018

Whites in Iowa and New Hampshire hold back racial progress

Almost as outrageous as the gross overrepresentation of white men in leadership positions in the Democrat party is the enormous home field advantage white society privileges itself with in the presidential nominating process.

The US is 60.7% white. But Iowa is 85.7% white and New Hampshire a staggering 90.5% white. We have to go all the way back to Bill Clinton in 1992 to find a Democrat nominee who did not win either Iowa or New Hampshire. And that was before the internet, let alone social media. We may as well be talking about the first continental congress. In the new media age it is for all intents and purposes impossible to get the nomination without winning at least one of the two opening contests.

The primary calendar is backwards-looking. The time for a calendar that gives a voice to America's future instead of clinging desperately to its troubled past is NOW!

It is time for California, the country's most populous and progressive state, to take its rightful place at the front of the line. As hard as it is to believe, in 2016, in a competitive primary campaign, the nomination was a foregone conclusion before Californians even went to the polls.

The golden state gave the Democrat candidate 13.3% of her votes nationwide yet had no say in who that candidate was. None. More than 1-in-8 Democrat voters--and disproportionately people of color--were effectively disenfranchised by the country's putatively progressive party.
The tired past pointing towards
the vibrant future

The definitive lily-white states of Iowa and New Hampshire, in contrast? Combined they gave her a mere 1.5%. How is this even possible in [insert current year]?!

Some pale person like Elizabeth Warren or Joe Biden is going to try and use those white states to box out candidates of the future. We can't let this failed strategy fail again. People of color are the future not just of the Democrat party but of the entire country. Obama won easily in 2008 and 2012. Regressing back to a familiar but tired white face at the top of the ticket was what allowed the horror that is the Drumpf presidency to exist at all.

[/s]

This is a point we should put pressure on relentlessly. Ask Democrat politicians (and aspiring politicians) who are white--especially men--why they think they have a right to take a seat away from a POC. Do it at the local level, in news article comments, on call-in shows, at debates, at townhalls, and with white progressives in your social circles.

The tears in the coalition of the fringes are becoming more numerous and more substantive. Grab a piece of it and pull, hard.

Saturday, August 11, 2018

Kobach won the brown(er) counties

Of the twenty counties in Kansas where Hispanics comprise at least 15% of the population, Kobach won sixteen of them. Colyer won four. The state has three counties that are majority-Hispanic. Kobach handily won all three of them.

On average, the counties that went to Kobach are 13.1% Hispanic. The counties Colyer won are 7.3% Hispanic.

The correlation by county between Kobach's share and the share of the population that is Hispanic is a positive .28. Fairly modest, but not insignificant.

As the results came in on election night, they undercut a lot of the conventional wisdom about how the results would shake out. Most saliently, there was no clear rural/suburban/urban divide.

This correlation between a large Hispanic presence and Kobach's share is one I'd hoped would manifest, so it's encouraging to see it empirically validated. And the correlation between the voting share of white Republicans and the Hispanic presence is almost certainly higher than .28, since the counties with lots of Hispanics will include larger shares of Hispanics voting against Kobach than counties with few Hispanics.

If the Ned Flanderesses of the cuck corridor are able to push back, however feebly, instead of lying on their backs and taking it, there's still hope the West will yet find the will to survive.

Parenthetically, all data presented above are calculated in a two-way race between Kobach and Colyer. Adding the vote totals of the other throwaway candidates into the mix was a tedious proposition for very likely no meaningful change in the results.

Wednesday, August 08, 2018

Stretching Jeff

Colyer's press release:


No complaints from me about using small, round numbers to illustrate abstract proportionalities in ways that are easy to grasp.


But that approach is also easy to reverse engineer.


So, to be precise, Colyer's phrase "hundreds of votes" translates to... 102 votes. C'mon, Jeff, that's a little misleading, isn't it?

Regarding the outcome, I remain cautiously optimistic. Kobach has a razor-thin edge of 191 votes with absentee military, provisional, and snail mail post-marked no later than August 7th yet to be counted.

Kobach won two of the three counties--Leavenworth and Bourbon--that include military bases. Colyer won one, Riley. The largest of the three is Leavenworth. Kobach clean up there, 51.2%-34.2%. Riley county, the second-largest of the three, is also home to Kansas State University. The latter accounts for a larger share of the county's population, so Colyer's 45.5%-31.9% advantage is at least in part attributable to KSU.

Advantage: Kobach.

Provisional ballots traditionally present the most trouble for irregular voters. In this context, those are Trumpian Kobach voters. The Colyer people are Republican lifers who dutifully and reliably vote for the Establishment candidate whenever the polls are open and people who have no intention of voting for the GOP in the general (see below). Their ballots will pass muster.

Keep in mind that the current totals do not include any provisional ballots--those that are subsequently deemed legitimate will be added onto the current totals in the future.

Advantage: Kobach.

Colyer won early voting by healthy margins just about everywhere.

Most saliently, he opened with a huge early lead in Johnson County on account of this, enjoying a 4,000-vote margin when the first batch came in. Among day-of voters, though, Kobach held his own in a county that was conventionally assumed to be the one that would give Colyer his win. But the earlies favoring Colyer and the day-ofs favoring Kobach was the general trend everywhere.

If it's just day-of voters, Kobach is declared the winner last night. Who are the people who mailed their ballots in at the last minute? Largely those weren't planning on voting but decided to in response to Trump's endorsement of Kobach on Monday.

Advantage: Kobach.

Tangentially, "RINO" is an acronym usually reserved for people like John McCain. That's not very accurate, though, since McCain usually does vote with his fellow Republicans along party lines.

As was explained to me last night, the actual RINOs are members of the electorate in a place like, say, Kansas, which is Republican-dominated at the state level. They register as Republican so that they are essentially allowed to vote twice. First, they vote for the most leftist Republican who has a chance of winning in the GOP primary. Then in the general they reliably vote for the Democrat. Either way they get a leftist who has promised them the gibs.

These people are heavily overrepresented among early voters because many of them don't actually follow politics, they just do what their unions, pension organizations, etc tell them to do. To maximize the electoral impact, said organizations send out instructions ahead of time and instruct their members to vote early.

The last few days have been a blur. I'm running a big sleep deficit, so excuse the dereliction in responding to comments at the moment. It will be rectified in a day or two.

Monday, August 06, 2018

White male overrepresentation among congressional Democrats

Shocking. Unconscionable. Despicable. Retrograde. Embarrassing. Hidebound. Anachronistic. Bigoted. Troubling. Problematic.

These are just a few words that spring to mind upon discovering the gross overrepresentation of white men among Democrat leadership.

The first graph shows the distribution of the Democrat electorate in the 2016 presidential election among white men and among minorities*:


The second graph shows the distribution of congressional Democrats following the 2016 election among the same:


Member of the Hispanic
Congressional Congress
Barely 1-in-5 Democrat voters are white men but nearly half of the Democrat leadership are white men. And that's with letting people like this get away with pretending to be other than white men.

It's [insert Current Year], people! How is this even possible?!?!!!11111

It shouldn't take costly, stressful, triggering primaries for the Joe Crowleys of the world to be dragged off kicking and screaming from their positions of patriarchal privilege. The white men in the Democrat party who are blocking the progress of women and minorities finding proportional representation in the country's highest legislative bodies need to act immediately--like, yesterday!--to have a shot at squeezing, barely, onto the right side of history.

The long arc of the universe bends towards ¡Ocasio-Cortez!, nazis.

* Yes, I know women are, technically speaking, a majority, but intersectionality, oppression, patriarchy!

Thursday, August 02, 2018

Kobach vs degenerate mendacity

Pairing up with the failing Kansas City Star, ProPublica deployed an "October surprise" attempt to snatch the Kansas Republican gubernatorial nomination from Kris Kobach. Several national outlets like Ralph Maddow, Single Mother Jones, and Daily Poz simultaneously deployed articles on it. As we've long argued here, this race has ramifications extending far beyond this middle American flyover state.

Read the whole thing and it will become clear--if you didn't take my word for it!--that Kobach is the real deal when it comes to the National Question. He's been boldly fighting in the immigration trenches since the early 2000s, years before he became a public figure.

The gist of the story:
Kris Kobach likes to tout his work for Valley Park, Missouri. He has boasted on cable TV about crafting and defending the town’s hardline anti-immigration ordinance. He discussed his “victory” there at length on his old radio show. He still lists it on his resume.

But “victory” isn’t the word most Valley Park residents would use to describe the results of Kobach’s work. With his help, the town of 7,000 passed an ordinance in 2006 that punished employers for hiring illegal immigrants and landlords for renting to them. But after two years of litigation and nearly $300,000 in expenses, the ordinance was largely gutted. Now, it is illegal only to “knowingly” hire illegal immigrants there — something that was already illegal under federal law. The town’s attorney can’t recall a single case brought under the ordinance.
The whole thing is tendentious. The ruinous financial costs associated with the laws Kris helped write and pass have come from open borders organizations like the ACLU in the form of lawfare waged against every municipality that has passed them. Leftist judges, via case law, cherry-pick the rulings of leftist judges who came before them to buttress their own political rulings. It's a sham. The process makes a mockery of the legal process.

For quite modest fees, Kobach has teamed up with frustrated cities wanting to do something about the illegal invasion the federal government refuses to stop. The anti-white ACLU responds to that in each instance with unending lawsuits against the legislation until the outnumbered and outgunned cities tap out.

It's not until paragraph 40 that the shysters let readers in on the source of the litigation and consequent ruinous expenses. As you may have guessed, they aren't coming from Kobach:
The ACLU had asked an appeals court to order Hazleton to reimburse it for $2.4 million in attorneys fees. 
Despite that, Kobach told the Hazleton paper, the Standard Speaker, that the city shouldn’t expect many more substantial legal bills. “At this stage of the game, costs are much lower for both sides,” he said, adding that “they are minuscule costs as opposed to costs at the front end of a lawsuit.” 
That may have been true to the extent that he was describing his own fees. But a year later, Hazleton was ordered to pay the ACLU $1.4 million to cover its attorneys’ fees.
As for what Kobach actually earned:
Kobach rode the attention the cases generated to political prominence, first as Kansas secretary of state, and now as a candidate for governor in the Republican primary on Aug. 7. He also earned more than $800,000 for his immigration work, paid by both towns and an advocacy group, over 13 years.
Hold the phone! A lawyer who went to Harvard, Oxford, and Yale for his BA, PhD, and JD, respectively, made $62,000 a year working in the legal profession! It's outrageous, so outrageous that even though it's been public information for over a decade, we had to gaslight it into a fake news story less than a week away from the primary!

Is the billing hour rate of a single verminous lawyer from the pack the ACLU has devoted to fighting Kobach at every turn--$1.4 million worth for lawfare against a single city--lower than Kobach's? Rhetorical.

Incidentally, the ACLU is actively campaigning on behalf of Jeff Colyer, the current Kansas governor Kris is attempting to primary. Having managed to make a killing frustrating Kobach's legislative agenda, the anti-white (((organization))) is a leetle beet worried about what a full-throttled gentile from the heartland might do to them with a little executive power at his back. Racketeering, anyone? I'd take it, though treason--and the penalties for it--would be even better.

The layman could be forgiven for thinking that Kobach's record has been one of legal defeat after legal defeat. But many of the laws he helped craft have withstood intense, unrelenting lawfare assaults, most notably in Arizona and also in Alabama and Nebraska.

Instead of lending a hand, or even merely voicing moral support, Cuckservative Inc--including Colyer, of course--hasn't missed a chance to stick a knife in Kobach's back at every opportunity.

Kobach, like Trump, is a bare-knuckled fighter, though. When the ACLU came out in support of Colyer, Kobach celebrated it. When the fuggernaught flipped out over Kobach's mounted machine gun replica, he mocked them and hasn't missed a chance to ride around in it since.

What has this coordinated hit piece done to Kobach's chances, by the way? Oops:


There's no margin of victory too wide, no amount of humiliation too undeserved for a spineless cuck like Ephialtes Colyer.