The percentages of these states' populations that are non-Hispanic white are 94%, 83%, 71%, 82%, and 75%, respectively. Compare that to the 63% of the country as a whole that is non-Hispanic white and we see that the putative problem of "White privilege" is something whites treat more seriously than non-whites do.
While I'm partial to Z-Man's Cloud People/Dirt People distinction on account of my childhood fondness for 16-bit role playing games, the Derb, who has long used the Goodwhite/Badwhite distinction, underscores the intra-racial nature of America's great cultural divide:
Nobody’s passions are stirred by thinking about other races in the aggregate. What gets our juices flowing is thinking about our own status ranking among people of our own race. That’s what supplies the driving energy, the will to combat, in the Cold Civil War: How do other white people see me? No white person gives a fig about how blacks see him. Who cares what blacks think?To "No white person" it might be added "who thinks systematically about meta issues involving race"--I've come across plenty of white proles who care far too much about what blacks think about them--but that's a tangential quibble with an important observation.
8 comments:
Hey, we're making progress. MN, RI, and Wash. have managed to reduce their white population by 11-15 points since 1990. And the last year listed 2012, doesn't take into account either an accurate count of extant immigrant populations (ya think every illegal Mexican was counted?) or subsequent invasions. According to Vdare, displacement of American workers really intensified in Obama's last year and God knows how many invaders aren't even working. And ask yourself, why the Hell is any foreigner over 55 allowed to enter this country in the first place? As if native born people aren't resentful enough about not getting back from the gov. what they paid into it in the absence of elder parasites.
Folks, the scary thing about post-1990 large Metro areas becoming for all intents and purposes, foreign embassies to various countries, is that cities in the late 1800's/early 1900's also became hotbeds of crime and anti-Americanism and that was on account of Irish, Southern Euro, and Eastern Euro immigrants. Look at what we've got ourselves into now.
BTW, the Northern bias is yet more evidence that the further North you go, the more puritan and less Scots-Irish people are.
Feryl,
Yeah, I was jolted by how much several states have changed just since I started blogging in 2005 when I did a lot of demographic comparisons between states. In my mind my sloppy for Rhode Island was "white slum". But with over 1 out of 4 being non-white, that's not accurate.
OMG, finally we have a "list" of awful, awful places which democrat social fascist moles buried DEEP in the gutz of the State Dept can use to negotiate with l'il Kim in NoKo
For each city in List A (Seattle, Portland, SF, LA, SD) that l'il Kim swears to Not Nuke, he can chose a whole danged State (our 5 top white privileged deplorable places) to Nuke
Congratz to the Social Fascist Politburo of the Democrat Party for coming up with such a nuanced Chinese Restaurant Family Style Menu of the deaths of millions
Guess "line" will be: Since these deplorably white states lack "people of color" it's really no-harm/no-foul if & when they're Nuked. In fact, no reason to even retaliate against the Norkies at all :)
Democrat diplomacy at it's finest. Maybe they can get John "WorldButtPlugDay" Kerry back ?
If you think the people from Zeal are assholes, you should see Solaris from Xenogears.
On the plus side, though, I think tapping the limitless power of Lavos may end up being a reasonable alternative to over-reliance on fossil fuels.
Jokah,
Ha, thanks for that. That was the next one on my queue before I met my wife. I'll get to it, eventually.
Harnessing Lavos would be even better than making nuclear fusion work!
Readers see also:
American Nations Series
The good whites need to be told to "shut up" a lot more.
https://youtu.be/aM8iT1UHnjI?t=209
Post a Comment