Sunday, December 18, 2016

Diversity! is incompetency

The recounts produced a wider margin of victory for Trump in Wisconsin and turned up severe voter fraud in Democrat-controlled Detroit. Too bad they missed the recount deadline in Pennsylvania--Philadelphia's corrupt political machine is notoriously even worse than Detroit's!

From commenter Sid:
The problem with barring white men from leadership roles is that you've cut yourself off from the biggest pool of leadership talent in the country. Imagine if there were an NFL team that barred black men from joining their team: they might be able to find good players here and there, and maybe even win a few games, but barring black talent from your team would be disastrous in the long run.
And:
The Democrats have thus handicapped themselves for ideological reasons. There are far more men than women suited for leadership. Black men have masculine charisma, but the number ready to lead on national issues is quite small. Hispanic and Asian men are rarely charismatic and seldom appeal to people outside of their racial bloc. Is Julian Castro really the best we can find? Apparently so.
An excerpt from Steve Sailer's running commentary about the wicked witch's inept campaign:
Politico spoke to a dozen officials working on or with Clinton’s Michigan campaign, and more than a dozen scattered among other battleground states, her Brooklyn headquarters and in Washington who describe an ongoing fight about campaign tactics, an inability to get top leadership to change course.
Obama's campaign headquarters:

Lots of men--well, biological males, anyway
Hillary's campaign headquarters:

Termagants on trendy MacBooks
While I thought the election would be much closer than the Establishment predicted and that Trump would win the legitimate vote from US citizens, I suspected the rigged system would narrowly keep him from officially winning the presidency.

I overestimated the competence of our opposition. This is another reason we should cheer the elevations of the Keith Ellisons and the Donna Brazilles of the Democrat party--not just because they accentuate the Core-v-Fringe division between the two major parties but also because they're less intelligent and less knowledgeable than the David Axelrods and the Howard Deans are.

12 comments:

Random Dude on the Internet said...

There's no doubt that nepotism is a problem with the GOP but the Democrats now suffer from a one-two punch of nepotism and diversity that will cripple their operations. The proud POCs of color who are now infesting their senior leadership will just divert money away from white Democrat strongholds and into more boondoggles for black districts. Forget about winning rural Minnesota districts, let's funnel more money into "voter outreach" in Philadelphia instead. Then when the country turns even redder in 2018 and 2020, their media lapdogs can kvetch about the rise of racism in America when really it boils down to incompetent Democrat leadership. Fortunately, there will be plenty of Democrats who know what the problem is but because they are white straight males, they won't get the opportunity to exercise leadership.

Audacious Epigone said...

Random Dude,

It'll be interesting to see if GOPe strategists keep selling the 'minority outreach' crap as the Democrats become even more explicitly non-white in identity and orientation or if they'll adopt the Sailer Strategy explicitly (or at least implicitly, like the Trump campaign did).

chris said...

"Then when the country turns even redder in 2018 and 2020".

Here's hoping the Republicans can gain enough control over Congress and state legislatures to make Constitutional amendments that disempower the left for good much like the Law and Justice Party are doing in Poland.

Random Dude on the Internet said...

> It'll be interesting to see if GOPe strategists keep selling the 'minority outreach' crap as the Democrats become even more explicitly non-white in identity and orientation or if they'll adopt the Sailer Strategy explicitly (or at least implicitly, like the Trump campaign did).

Sadly I suspect that the RNC still thinks minority conversion will be more effective than the implicit/explicit use of the Sailer Strategy. There are still more than a few Republicans who consider Trump's victory to be a fluke. If the GOP wins some key elections in the midterms using the Sailer Strategy, you might get some people in the right places who will at least acknowledge its effectiveness.

I also think it is a generational thing. Boomer Republicans are probably more likely to hang their hat on minority conversion but the up and coming Republicans will probably be less shy to use the Sailer Strategy to win tight elections.

mikestreetstation said...

Keith Ellison as DNC chair seems like a deep uncover GOP operation (if they were competent). Muslim, 9/11 Truther, Black Separatist history... if the DNC actually picks this guy, the Republican winning streak will continue. I could hardly have dreamed up a better person for that position.

Sid said...

AE, thank you for posting my comments! Much appreciated.

Random Dude: "I also think it is a generational thing. Boomer Republicans are probably more likely to hang their hat on minority conversion but the up and coming Republicans will probably be less shy to use the Sailer Strategy to win tight elections."

Right. Baby Boomers tend to be naturally idealistic about race relations and civil rights issues. They find racism from and among whites to be abhorrent, and believe that everyone will become equal in all of the important regards in the future. It's fairly old-fashioned, but that's what they grew up thinking.

In contrast, younger generations tend to either be more realistic or more fanatical about race. On the one hand, you have people like us who acknowledge the reality of human differences, and understand that reality entails embracing political positions which are radically different from what the Establishment finds permissible. On the other hand, you have SJWs who have convinced themselves to believe that black people don't commit more crimes than whites, and all the statistics in the world proving otherwise are just racist.

A lot of it has to do with the experiences in our upbringing. Baby Boomers grew up during a time when they saw cops waterhosing and siccing dogs on blacks on TV. We were raised on cognitive dissonance: we saw all sorts of unpleasant realities with our lying eyes, while being told that recognizing those realities would make us no better than slave owners or Nazis, so that's why you'll see both the alt-right and SJWs among the younger generations.

Audacious Epigone said...

Young whites are more likely to be identitarian than their parents and grandparents are. Those who are unapologetic about their ancestry and their heritage are today's dissidents, too, and I suspect that indefatigability and incorrigibility are ours like they were the New Left's in the 60s and 70s.

Random Dude on the Internet said...

It's tempting to assume that young Republicans are like Liz Mair and Meghan McCain who make RINOs (such as her dad John McCain) look like Goldwater Republicans. Instead I really believe that most young Republicans are more in the mold of Stephen Miller, a pragmatist with shitlord leanings who reject not just the leftist indoctrination but the boomer idealism of how we should just all get along, man.

Joshua Sinistar said...

Lincoln's Party is as dead as he is now. Watch the debacle unfold and see it for yourself. Those limp dicked weasels who did nothing against Obamao will suddenly line up against all things Trump. Those whiny little cocksuckers like Lindsey Graham Cracker and Lyin Ryan will blow up their RINO lube party.
Politics is just War disguised. It will get hot. Trump is THE LAST CHANCE. They'll blow it. They always do. Its not just Hubris, these fuckers really are STUPID.

FlyingHighin2016 said...

Had to chuckle when this link showed up in Ann Coulter's Twitter stream.You may have to amend an earlier post of yours, though w/ an asterisk in case they root out more fraud.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/12/voter-fraud-election-officials-find-782-votes-voters-detroit/

It shows that Detroit City proper narrowly beat out DC for gold medal in the DEM lapdog contest. 248,211 votes cast, w/ HRC taking 95% & Trump only 3%. Some hardcore luv for Hill in the ruins of the Motor City

Audacious Epigone said...

Joshua,

They may be quislings, but they may just be opportunistic, self-serving cowards, too. Hollow men can be bent to whoever can exert a powerful will.

FlyingHighin2016,

Ha, thanks for that.

That post needs an asterisk, anyway, though with how unreliable the vote count from Detroit is, it's hard to know for sure.

Parenthetically, I didn't follow why at that link it reads as though Trump's margin of victory in the state was wide enough that the extra (read fraudulent) votes in Detroit wouldn't have been enough to change the outcome. What? As though those fake votes may have helped Trump? All it means is that Trump's real margin of victory in the state was wider than what was reported. In no universe does reducing fraudulent votes from Detroit help Hillary.

Joshua Sinistar said...

Oh these fools aren't men at all. They're all bought, that's all. Even politicians will bend when the wind blows hard enough, but these fuckers ignoring voters shows they're not even sleazy politicos, they're just whores, plain and simple. They do what their pimps tell them to. They'll pay the piper, all of them. They have no money, or power. Its all fake. That Monopoly money is worthless without White Men to work and make for it. They slit their own throats.