Sunday, October 18, 2015

For every black lynched during Jim Crow, ten whites are murdered by blacks today

The question isn't whether or not reparations should be paid out, it is whether or not they should stop being paid out:


From 1882-1968 3,446 blacks were lynched in the US. That comes to an average of just under 40 blacks per year. In 2011, to take a recent year in which data are readily available, at least 448 whites were murdered by blacks (keeping in mind that the rate of black-on-white homicide is several times higher than the rate of white-on-black homicide and that in more than one-in-three cases of homicide the murderer is never identified). If we subtract from this figure the number of blacks murdered by whites during the same year (193), we still get a net interracial white body count of 255.

It is likely the case that, over the course of US history, more whites have been killed by blacks than blacks have been killed by whites. And with every passing year, that black advantage over whites in interracial murders increases.

Of course it naturally follows from this that the biggest intellectual sensation in the US today is a black guy who profitably laments things like white privilege and the legacy of slavery, a message that Colin Flaherty parsimoniously reduces to three words: "White people suck"!

Perhaps it's unfair to be so dismissive of the work of Ta-Nehisi Coates. Besides making life miserable for Coke executives, Coates accurately perceives that rather than fading into the past, racial strife is America's future. Google's Ngram corroborates that insight:



7 comments:

Anonymous said...

I just want to let you know that I can use the same murder stats to show that far more women are killed by men than the reverse. Think about it. The vast majority of Blacks are not intentionally out to get anyone. They just have higher levels of impulsiveness and aggression than Whites, on average. Likewise, the vast majority of White men are not intentionally out to get anyone***. They just have higher levels of impulsiveness and aggression than White women, on average.




***the few who are tend to be WNs, MRAs, and homophobes. There is huge overlap between the three groups.

Audacious Epigone said...

Anon,

What is your point? Impulsivity needs cultural constraints or it runs wild. Telling blacks they are victims of white aggression removes those cultural constraints.

Anonymous said...

reparations for what? Reparations are paid why? The African American population of America is far richer than any African nation. They were taken as slaves from a place they would be dead in now and is in almost every case worse off than they have it. I will add they have been given more than the earning of the Fortune 500 more than any race in the recorded history of civilization. No other race was given full citizenship and full rights and this level of benefits. Another likely useful observation is that if we took Vietnamese slaves they would all be store owners, doctors and working not committing endless crimes.

Anonymous said...

@audacious

My point is that race/gender differences exist but there is no superior race or gender. The average straight White man does some things better than the average person who is non-White or non-male, but not everything. WNs and MRAs are just as dishonest as anti-White liberals and anti-male feminists. Both sides only cite the truth when it fits into their respective narratives. I cite the truth whether or not it benefits me personally.

I am not pro- or anti-White. I am not pro- or anti-Colored. I am not a feminist or an MRA. I am pro-truth and anti-lies. Leftists need to wake up and see that Blacks and Hispanics have a lot of problems; WNs need to wake up and see that Whites are not the best at everything. Feminists need to wake up and see that the average man is better at doing some things than the average woman; MRAs need to wake up and see that the average woman is better at doing some things than the average man.

Audacious Epigone said...

Anon,

Who are you speaking to specifically? I'm not aware of any major HBDers who claim some sort of universal superiority of one group over another. American Renaissance, the leading intellectual white nationalist organization in the US, doesn't argue that either.

If we operate in the parameters of standard WEIRDO mores and morality, whites are better fits, on average, than NAMs are. This isn't surprising since mores and norms grow out of the populations they exist in. WEIRDO mores are not synonymous with evolutionary fitness though (and may turn out to be antithetical to them).

Anonymous said...

@audacious

I am speaking of the stormfront idiots, and of most of the morons who comment at amren and heartiste. I am speaking of the red-pill guys too.

Anonymous said...

Be interesting to look at tax break usage and accountancy usage by native households as well (probably a better measure of not paying your share).