Thursday, April 26, 2007

Immigration to make red states bigger, more purple

Like the Republican Executive/Democratic Congressional split? Demographic trends are increasing the likelihood that it will become the norm into 2020 (free partial here):

When House seats are redistributed among the states after the 2010 census, immigrants -- legal and illegal -- will play a key role in the shift of perhaps nine seats to Sun Belt states from those in the Northeast and Midwest. That trend will only gain steam, say demographers at the Brookings Institution and Population Reference Bureau, two Washington think tanks that analyzed U.S.

Census Bureau projections. After the 2030 census, they predict, Florida, where almost one in five residents is an immigrant, will add seven congressional seats. California, which has 9.6 million immigrants, will add two. And Texas, which added 788,000 immigrants between 2000 and 2005, will gain eight.
A few states that have gone to the GOP in the recent past stand to be the biggest winners. Florida is projected to gain nine additional seats (and electoral college votes), Texas will net eight, and Arizona is set to pick up five. It's unlikely that Texas or Arizona will shift from blue to red in the near future. Georgia, North Carolina, and Virginia, all of which will seats, probably won't either. But Florida and Nevada (another gainer) have been 'swing' states that will likely become reliably Democratic in the next fifteen years.

Several upper-Midwestern states hemorrhage a couple of seats, while the Northeast--especially New York--takes a pounding of its own.

Despite the immediate electoral boost the GOP will receive, most of the new Congressional seats will go to Democrats. The foreign-born push up housing prices, depress wages (increasing wealth disparities), increase welfare recipiency, disproportionately benefit from special legal subsidies like affirmative action, tend to be less educated, less prosperous, and less white than natives, and live in urban areas at greater proportions than natives do. All of these attributes better characterize Democratic voters than Republican voters. Eventually the gains enjoyed in specific districts will morph into gains at the state level.

From the vantage point of one who at this point in time disagrees less with Democratic foreign policy than with the that of the Bush Administration, but who generally favors Congressional Republican domestic goals, the future promises the worst of both worlds.

The future might not portend only defeat for the GOP, however. The rigorous relationship (an r of .86) between white fertility and Bush's share of a state's vote in 2004, in tandem with the fact that about 80% of children end up voting in the same way their parents do, means that while the Hispanic population grows to the benefit of the Democratic Party, the GOP will increasingly become the party of white Americans.

Where does this new ethnically-divided political future leave blacks? Out in the cold:

The flow of new immigrants also could upset African-American representation in the House. University of Maryland professor James Gimpel, who studies African-American political power, says as many as six black House Democrats could lose their seats after the 2010 census. As it is, he says, Hispanics outnumber blacks in five districts now represented by blacks.
That would represent a 14% reduction in the number of black representatives in the House. While blacks consistently support immigration restriction, the Democratic Party as a whole stands to gain too much from the new arrivals to back away from the Kennedy-McCain amnesty. And the guaranteed monolithic black vote provides little incentive for Democratic leaders to make good on black support for reform.

The $64,000 question is why the 'geniuses' at the RNC are seemingly eager to relegate their party to perpetual minority status. Immigration reform is a populist cause that finds broad support across the political spectrum. While the Iraq war cost the GOP dearly in the November '06 elections, Republican immigration restrictionists fared considerably better.


Gary said...

"...while the Hispanic population grows to the benefit of the Democratic Party, the GOP will increasingly become the party of white Americans."

Nazzo fast. The GOP's current management is so invested in "outreach" to Hispanics that there is just about zero chance they're going to make any effort, at least publicly, to appeal to their traditional base, i.e. English speaking middle class Americans of European descent. After all, we're a bunch of bigots and rednecks.

The GOP may think we have nowhere else to go, and in fact have said so when they think no one is paying attention. Taking a group of voters for granted is one thing, but these people apparently think GOP voters are so simple minded that mentioning the words "abortion" or "gay marriage" are enough to keep them on the plantation, and to overlook the immigration mess, out of control spending, Harriet Miers, etc. etc.

The GOP is going to go out of business and will eventually be replaced by another party. It will not come about because they failed to attract enough Hispanic voters; it will be because they antagonized too many white voters.

Anonymous said...

As a fellow bigot and redneck, i have to agree with Gary.
In any event, the political elites in this country (right, center and left) have already decided to throw the blacks under the bus. However, I concur with the prediction the the GOP will disappear or it may split due to an internal schism over issues whites deem important. I will be voting for the party that supports white interests as well as supporting them financially.
That however is just the tip of the iceberg regarding race issues in this nation and where we are heading. White people will eventually figure out that your skin color is your uniform, something blacks and hispanics have known, and used, for years and begin to vote that way. Even the "liberals." Most of them live in nice (white) areas so they know the score, they are just too scared to admit to themselves, yet. I won't miss the GOP for that matter and I don't know anyone who will.

Audacious Epigone said...

I think a split is more likely than the abolition of the GOP, at least in the near future. The stronghold in the House (with the help of Jeff Sessions in the Senate) kept the McCain-Kennedy disaster from being signed in.

A viable third-party that eventually pushes out the old GOP would be ideal. But there currently is no one willing to run Reform to garner the necessary 5% of the popular Presidential vote to get the ball rolling. If Giuliani, McCain, or Brownback get the bid, however, I'll be voting for whoever he is.

al fin said...

The GOP will try to become as big a tent as it can, just as the Democratic Party tries to include as many suckers as it can. The Democrats promise more benefits, so for low-IQ, low-ambition people, Democrats have the edge.

As a libertarian, I hate to see either of the big phonies getting too much power. But of the two, I'll go with whichever builds the less intrusive government.

MikeFrizzi said...

I tried so hard to be a good little Democrat, but the way the administration has treated immigration policy, especially the eb5 investor visa, really leaves me wanting more from my party and considering a switch of parties.

Anonymous said...

Although this post may adequately describe the adverse effects of many immigrants, devices such as the immigrant investor visa provide hope. Immigration through this process actually has a very positive affect on our nation's economic situation.